Advice
Why Most Difficult Conversation Training is Complete Rubbish (And What Actually Works)
Our Favourite Blogs:
You know what really gets my goat? Sitting through another "difficult conversations" workshop where some consultant with a laminated certificate tells you to use "I" statements and maintain eye contact. Absolute codswallop.
After 18 years of running teams, coaching executives, and cleaning up the aftermath of workplace disasters, I can tell you this: 87% of difficult conversation training is designed by people who've never had to fire someone while their kids were asking where daddy works. The real world doesn't operate like a Harvard Business Review case study.
Here's what they don't tell you in those sanitised training rooms with their flipcharts and role-playing exercises. Most difficult conversations aren't planned. They happen when Sharon from accounts decides to have a meltdown about the new roster system right in front of the biggest client you've landed all year. Or when your top performer rocks up Monday morning and announces they're pregnant—again—just as you're about to launch the most important project in company history.
The traditional approach is fundamentally flawed. It assumes you've got time to prepare, that both parties are reasonable adults, and that following a script will somehow magically resolve deep-seated workplace tensions. What a load of rubbish.
Let me share what actually works, based on real experience, not textbook theory.
Stop Trying to Be Everyone's Mate
First controversial opinion: you don't need everyone to like you. In fact, trying to be liked during difficult conversations usually makes things worse. I learned this the hard way back in 2019 when I spent three months trying to "gently guide" an underperforming team member instead of just having the bloody conversation. Know what happened? The whole team's morale tanked because they watched me dance around obvious problems.
The best managers I know—and I'm talking about the ones running the most successful teams at companies like Atlassian and Canva—they're not trying to win popularity contests. They're clear, direct, and surprisingly kind in their honesty. There's a massive difference between being harsh and being direct.
When you approach difficult conversations from a place of genuine care rather than people-pleasing, something magical happens. People actually respect you more. They know where they stand. The uncertainty that kills team dynamics? Gone.
But here's where most training gets it wrong again. They tell you to sandwich criticism between compliments. "You're doing great, but you're consistently late, but we really value your contribution." Stop it. Just stop. Adults can handle direct feedback without the emotional manipulation.
The 24-Hour Rule (That No One Talks About)
Here's something they never mention in those fancy workshops: timing is everything. And I mean everything.
Most workplace blow-ups happen because someone tries to address an issue when emotions are running hot. You've probably done it yourself—I certainly have. Someone pushes your buttons, and boom, you're having "the conversation" right there and then. Disaster.
I've got a simple rule now: 24 hours. Unless it's urgent (and I mean genuinely urgent, not just "feels urgent because I'm cranky"), I wait 24 hours before addressing any conflict. This isn't about cooling off—although that helps—it's about getting perspective.
During those 24 hours, I ask myself three questions: What outcome do I actually want? What's really driving my frustration? What would happen if I did nothing?
You'd be amazed how often the answer to that last question is "absolutely nothing bad would happen." Sometimes we create difficult conversations out of our own need to be right or to control every situation. Learning when not to have the conversation is just as important as learning how to have it well.
The Real Secret: It's Not About the Conversation
Second controversial opinion: most difficult conversations aren't really about what you think they're about.
That heated discussion about project deadlines? It's probably about feeling undervalued. The argument about flexible working arrangements? Often it's about trust. The complaints about the new software system? Usually about fear of change or feeling left out of decision-making.
I see this constantly when I'm called in to mediate workplace disputes. Everyone's arguing about surface-level stuff while the real issues—respect, recognition, autonomy, fairness—are churning away underneath. Address the symptoms and you'll be having the same conversation again next month. Address the underlying needs and you might actually solve something.
This is where emotional intelligence for managers becomes crucial. Not the touchy-feely version that makes everyone uncomfortable, but the practical kind that helps you read what's really happening in your workplace.
The Australian Way: Cut Through the Bullshit
We Australians have a natural advantage when it comes to difficult conversations, and we're systematically training it out of ourselves with all this imported corporate speak.
Our natural directness, when combined with genuine care, is actually perfect for workplace conflicts. We don't need to wrap everything in corporate jargon or follow American-style conflict resolution models. We just need to remember how to have honest conversations without being complete arseholes about it.
I was working with a Melbourne-based manufacturing company last year where the production team and the office staff were at each other's throats. The previous consultant had them doing trust falls and writing letters to each other. Honestly. After two days of that nonsense, I threw out the program and just got everyone in a room with some decent coffee and said, "Right, what's actually going on here?"
Turns out the production team felt the office staff didn't understand the pressure they were under, and the office staff felt the production team didn't appreciate the complexity of their planning challenges. Within an hour we'd identified practical solutions: monthly cross-training sessions and a shared dashboard showing everyone's key metrics. Problem solved. No trust falls required.
Why Scripts Don't Work (And What to Do Instead)
The training industry loves giving people scripts. "When someone becomes defensive, say this..." "If they start crying, respond with..." Pure rubbish.
Difficult conversations are like jazz improvisation—you need to know the basic structure, but the magic happens when you respond to what's actually happening in the moment. Scripts make you sound like a robot and they completely miss the nuances of human interaction.
Instead of memorising phrases, focus on developing three core skills:
Genuine curiosity. Instead of preparing your rebuttal while they're talking, actually try to understand their perspective. Ask questions like "Help me understand why this is important to you" or "What would need to change for this to work better?"
Comfortable with silence. Most people panic when there's a pause in conversation and try to fill it with words. Learn to sit with silence. Some of the best breakthroughs happen in those quiet moments when people are processing what's been said.
Clear boundaries. Know what you're willing to negotiate on and what you're not. Don't pretend flexibility you don't have, and don't make promises you can't keep.
The Follow-Up That Actually Matters
Here's where 90% of difficult conversations fail: the follow-up. Or rather, the complete lack of meaningful follow-up.
You have the conversation, everyone agrees on some vague next steps, and then... nothing changes. Three months later you're having the same bloody conversation again because nobody did anything concrete to address the underlying issues.
Effective difficult conversations end with specific, measurable actions and clear timelines. Not "we'll try to communicate better" but "starting Monday, we'll have a 15-minute check-in every Tuesday at 2pm, and we'll review how it's working in three weeks."
And here's the bit that really matters: you actually follow through. I know, shocking concept. But the number of managers who have difficult conversations and then never mention them again is genuinely staggering.
When to Call in the Professionals
Look, I'm in the business of managing difficult conversations, so this might sound self-serving, but sometimes you need external help. Not because you're incompetent, but because some situations require specialist knowledge or an objective perspective.
If you're dealing with serious performance issues, potential discrimination claims, or conflicts that are affecting multiple team members, get professional support. Don't try to muddle through with generic advice from a blog post (yes, including this one).
The key is knowing the difference between normal workplace friction that you can handle yourself and serious issues that need specialist intervention. When in doubt, get advice early rather than waiting until small problems become major disasters.
The Uncomfortable Truth About Workplace Harmony
Final controversial opinion: perfect workplace harmony is neither possible nor desirable.
Some conflict is healthy. It means people care about their work and aren't just going through the motions. The goal isn't to eliminate all disagreement—it's to channel that energy productively rather than letting it fester into toxic workplace dynamics.
The best teams I've worked with have plenty of robust discussions and disagreements. They just know how to have them professionally and resolve them quickly. They've created cultures where difficult conversations are seen as normal business practice, not relationship-threatening events.
This cultural shift doesn't happen overnight, and it certainly doesn't happen because someone attended a one-day workshop on difficult conversations. It happens because leaders model the behaviour consistently and create psychologically safe environments where honest communication is valued over artificial politeness.
Maybe that's the real secret: stop calling them "difficult conversations" and start calling them "important conversations." Change the framing and you change everything else.
The workplace doesn't need more people walking on eggshells around each other. It needs more people willing to have honest, respectful conversations about the things that matter. Time to stop making it more complicated than it needs to be.